University of Madras
Syllabus with effect from 2020-2021
B.A English Literature
[2nd Year, 3rd Semester]
Background to English Literature-III
UNIT 1:
II. Literary Devices/Concepts.
1. 1.6. POETRY
Onomatopoeia, Pathetic
fallacy, Poetic license, Apostrophe, Personification, oxymoron, zeugma
Onomatopoeia
Onomatopoeia
(also known as, “nominatio,” “nominis,” “confictio,” “the new namer”;
etymologically from the Greek, literally “name making”) is a tuneful technique
which involves the use of a word, or phraseOpens in new window, the sound of
which resembles or naturally imitates the sound of the thing signified.
In
Onomatopoeia, the sounds are often produced by human beings, animals and
objects. Sounds produced by human beings include but not limited to: “hey,”
“clap,” “patter,” “giggle,” “ouch,” “mm,” “oh,” etc. Likewise, the sounds from
animals include: “hum,” “tweet,” “cackle,” “bark,” “croak,” “squeak,” “quack,”
etc. And those from objects include: “ding-dong,” “beep,” “tick-tock,” “vroom,”
“click-click,” “crackle,” “rattle,” etc. Some object sounds can be associated
with some action or movement.
Onomatopoetic
sounds usually produce a resounding effect of the sense it signifies, thus
making the signification efficiently expressive. For example: the name of the
bird “cuckoo” reproduces the resounding effect of its song; the word “bang”
reproduces resounding effect of an explosive sound or a gun-shot.
Onomatopoeia
is used by writers and poets as figurative language to create a heightened
experience for the reader. Onomatopoetic words are descriptive and provide a
sensory effect and vivid imagery in terms of sight and sound. This literary
device is prevalent in poetry, as onomatopoetic words are also conducive to
rhymes.
Common Examples of Onomatopoeia:
The buzzing bee flew away.
The sack fell into the river with a
splash.
The books fell on the table with a loud
thump.
He looked at the roaring
The rustling leaves kept me awake.
Pathetic fallacy:
The
term "pathetic fallacy" was coined by a British writer named John
Ruskin, who defined it as "emotional falseness." Ruskin originally
used the term to criticize what he saw as the sentimental attitude of 18th
century Romantic poets toward nature. The meaning of the term has shifted over
time, and now is often used to simply describe, rather than criticize, the
attribution of emotions to non-human things.
Pathetic
fallacy is a specific type of personification, or the attribution of human
qualities to non-human things.
Generally,
pathetic fallacy is confused with personification. The fact is that they differ
in their function. Pathetic fallacy gives human emotions to inanimate objects
of nature; for example, referring to weather features reflecting a mood.
Personification, on the other hand, is a broader term. It gives human
attributes to abstract ideas, animate objects of nature, or inanimate
non-natural objects.
For
example, the following descriptions refer to weather and how it affects the
mood, which can add atmosphere to a story: smiling skies, somber clouds, angry
storm, or bitter winter.
Poetic license:
The
literary term poetic license is a thing of many names that comes in many forms.
Also known as artistic license, literary license, dramatic license, historical
license, narrative licence, licentia poetica, or just simply license, poetic
license is a conversational term (or sometimes a euphemism).
The
term comes from Latin. Poetic derives from the Latin poeta, which means
"poet" or "maker." License comes from the Latin licentia,
which means "to be permitted." Basically, poetic license involves the
departure of facts or even rules for language in order to create a different
effect, usually dramatic, for a piece of work or speech.
This
term is more commonly used in reference to a poet's work when they have ignored
some of the rules for grammar for its effect. Shakespeare does this a lot in
his works. The infamous line from Julius Caesar: "Friends, Romans,
Countrymen, lend me your ears" is one example as he has omitted the use of
the word "and" after "Romans" in order to keep the line in
iambic pentameter.
Apostrophe:
Apostrophe
(etymologically derived from the Greek word apostrophein, literally meaning “to
turn away”), is a rhetorical device which consists when an orator interrupts
the flow of the discourse; turning his attention from his immediate audience,
to address some person or other objects different from that to which the
discourse was at first directed.
This
figure is seldom used; but when it is used, it is usually in a fashion of
violent commotion, which the speaker turns himself on all sides, and appeals to
the living and the dead, to angels and to men, to rocks, groves, and rivers,
for the justice of his cause, or calls upon them to sympathize with his joy,
grief, or resentment.
For
example, when Juliet talks to dead Romeo in Romeo and Juliet.
Apostrophe may also be used in calling
upon an abstract idea as in "O Death....".
Personification:
Personification
is a figure of speech in which an idea or thing is given human attributes
and/or feelings or is spoken of as if it were human. Personification is a
common form of metaphor in that human characteristics are attributed to nonhuman
things. This allows writers to create life and motion within inanimate objects,
animals, and even abstract ideas by assigning them recognizable human behaviors
and emotions.
Personification
exists in three degrees. In the first degree of personification, the object is
presented as having some qualities that properly belong only to living
creatures. It is often exhibited by simply using the masculine or feminine pronoun
instead of the neuter. Thus, a boat is represented as a female, war as a male,
in these expressions: “Pull a stroke or two — away with her
into deep water;” “War then showed his devastations.”
The
second degree of personification involves the representation of an object as
acting, or manifesting emotion, like a thing of life. Personifications of this
kind, which are employed not as expressions of excited feeling, but as
convenient condensations, to avoid circumlocutions, and the frequent
repetitions of long descriptions. Thus, the word “nature” is used as though it
were the name of a person, when evidently the author does not intend to
personify any fancied being or power, but it is more convenient to use that
appellation than some such expression as “the plan according to which material
things act,” or “the properties which this subject has;” and it is more
convenient to represent it as a person than to speak of the phenomena described
as simple effects.
The
third degree of Personification is seen when an object is addressed as if
alive, and listening to the speaker. When the mind is sufficiently aroused,
this boldest kind of Personification is pre-eminently forcible and beautiful. Personification
of this kind need not be confined to the sublimest subjects or to oratorical
writing.
Oxymoron:
An
oxymoron is a figure of speech that combines two seemingly contradictory or
opposite ideas to create a certain rhetorical or poetic effect and reveal a deeper
truth. Generally, the ideas will come as two separate words placed side by
side.
An
oxymoron (AHX-ee-MORE-ahn), from the Greek for “pointedly foolish” or “dully
sharp,” is a contradiction in terms. It seems illogical on its face, as the
basic construction is word + antonymic (the opposite of that word) modifier;
for example, minor crisis, as the former means “little or insignificant” while
the latter can mean “emergency.” As its etymology suggests, oxymorons are often
used for humor, especially satire.
This
excerpt from Irish poet William Butler Yeats’ famous poem "Easter
1916" has the prominent oxymoron "terrible beauty," which is
repeated again at the end of the poem. Despite the "terrible" things
that happened and the many lives lost, Yeats uses the term "beauty"
to bring attention to the positive ideals of independence that gained ground as
a result of this event: this desire for self-government is what spurred the Irish
War of Independence just a few years later.
In
this sense, the uprising was simultaneously terrible (in that it led to death)
and beautiful (in its romantic aspirations for independence).
Zeugma:
Zeugma
(derives from Greek, meaning 'yoking' or 'bonding'), is a figure concerned with
syntactical construction by which a word stands in the same relation to two
other words, but conveying two different meanings at the same time. Zeugma can
be humorous or interesting.
In
Zeugma, thus, one verb is connected with two nouns, to each of which a separate
verb should properly be supplied.
The essential features of this figure
are :
(i) There are two nouns.
(ii) One verb is connected with these
two nouns.
(iii) Each of these nouns requires a
separate verb.
Zeugma
can be used to create drama, add emotion, or produce a level of shock value.
While there can still be an underlying sense of confusion, generally, a zeugma
is used purposely.
For
example, "He hid his feelings and the ball." In the following
sentence 'hid' is used to describe about the feelings as well as the ball.
1.2. 1.7. DRAMA
Poetic justice
[Nemesis], Alienation effect, Defamiliarization, Fourth Wall, breaking the
Fourth Wall, Disguise, Foreshadowing, Suspension of disbelief
Poetic justice [Nemesis]:
Poetic
justice deals with the idea that good deeds are rewarded while evil ones are
punished.
When
bad or evil characters have some type of calamity or misfortune befall them in
a literary work. While the "bad guys" are not always punished in real
life, it is typical for the "good guys" to win in a work of
literature.
The
term was coined by the critic Thomas Rymer in his The Tragedies of the Last Age
Consider'd (1678) with reference to Elizabethan poetic drama: such justice is
‘poetic’, then, in the sense that it occurs more often in the fictional plots
of plays than in real life. As Miss Prism explains in Oscar Wilde's The
Importance of Being Earnest, ‘The good ended happily, and the bad unhappily.’
Alienation effect:
Defamiliarization
is a Russian Formalist concept adapted in by Bertolt Brecht and he called it an
alienation effect. This is used by dramatists mainly to
make familiar aspects of the social reality seem strange to prevent an
emotional connection with the audience. Many dramas use this effect to
constantly remind the audience that this is a work of art and needs no
emotional connection. The technique involves breaking the fourth wall and
talking to the audience.
Defamiliarization:
Defamiliarization,
as the word implies, is a process where something familiar is no longer
perceived as such. Specifically in writing, defamiliarization in literature
refers to a technique (a literary device, in a sense) where the writer offers
familiar, common things in an odd, unorthodox way.
The
purpose of defamiliarization is to cause the readers to question their
perception of reality (the known and familiar), through this process it
actually facilitates a much deeper and more comprehensive understanding of
reality.
Fourth Wall:
In
theater, the fourth wall is that invisible forcefield around the stage that
keeps actors in their own little world, and separate from the audience. Actors
on stage—and even on screen (we're looking at you, Jim Halpert)—sometimes break
the fourth wall for dramatic (or comedic) effect, and directly address the
audience. The fourth wall didn't really develop in the theater until the late
18th and 19th centuries.
Breaking the fourth:
Breaking
the fourth wall is not only reserved for comedy shows; for us book nerds, you
may have come across it as metafiction in literature. The term originated from
theatre and works from the perception of the stage as three solid walls. The
fourth being invisible. The characters talk to the space inhabited by the
audience. It plays a wider role in the genre of metafiction in literature.
The
narrator allows us to understand characters more through the eyes of other
people. It can be difficult to truly know how a character behaves until they
are positioned through the lens of another. How others perceive them without
them knowing and how their actions come across are easier to describe this way
than through a first-person narrative.
Disguise:
A
disguise can be anything which conceals or changes a person's physical
appearance, including a wig, glasses, makeup, fake moustache, costume or other
items. Camouflage is a type of disguise for people, animals and objects. Hats,
glasses, changes in hair style or wigs, plastic surgery, and make-up are also
used.
Foreshadowing:
Foreshadowing
is a literary device that writers utilize as a means to indicate or hint to
readers something that is to follow or appear later in a story. Foreshadowing,
when done properly, is an excellent device in terms of creating suspense and
dramatic tension for readers. It can set up emotional expectations of character
behaviors and/or plot outcomes. This can heighten a reader’s enjoyment of a
literary work, enhance the work’s meaning, and help the reader make connections
with other literature and literary themes.
Suspension of disbelief:
To
'suspend disbelief' is to temporarily accept as believable of events or
characters that would ordinarily be seen as incredible. This is usually to
allow an audience to appreciate works of literature or drama that are exploring
unusual ideas.
Romantic
poet Samuel Taylor Coleridge coined the idea of a "willing suspension of
disbelief" in his 1815 Biographia Literaria, where he referred to it as
"poetic faith."
Suspension
of disbelief is especially important when reading in genres like Magical
Realism, Gothic Literature, Science Fiction, or Fantasy, where some weird stuff
is bound to go down.
1.3. 1.8. NOVEL
Satire, Epiphany,
Paradox, Symbolic, Flat and Round Characters
Satire
is broadly defined as a literary genre that uses ridicule, irony, wit, sarcasm,
etc. to expose folly or vice or to lampoon an individual or group of
individuals. Thus a work of satire is crafted to mock and blame culprits with
the primary goal of imparting positive change in them.
It
brings about the picturesque scene of a ridiculous world created by the
satirist meant to excites laugher or merriment; and it is the introduction of
the real world meant to invite reflection on how society might correct ridiculous
habits or people simultaneously.
Epiphany:
An
epiphany is a sudden realization or discovery that illuminates a new perception
or awareness. Epiphany is often used to describe a rapid feeling of clarity or
insight in terms of finding an essential meaning or solution–what many describe
as an “aha!” moment. Epiphanies often take place at the climax of the story
arc.
Paradox:
A
paradox is a statement that contradicts itself, or that must be both true and
untrue at the same time. Paradoxes are quirks in logic that demonstrate how our
thinking sometimes goes haywire, even when we use perfectly logical reasoning
to get there.
But
a key part of paradoxes is that they at least sound reasonable. They’re not
obvious nonsense, and it’s only upon consideration that we realize their self-defeating
logic.
Symbolic:
Symbolism
is a literary device that refers to the use of symbols in a literary work. A
symbol is something that stands for or suggests something else; it represents
something beyond literal meaning. In literature, a symbol can be a word,
object, action, character, or concept that embodies and evokes a range of
additional meaning and significance.
Symbolism
began as an artistic movement in French poetry in the 19th century to combat
realism in favor of romanticism. It comes from the Latin word symbolus, which
means “a sign of recognition.”
Flat and Round Characters:
E.
M. Forster, in his 1927 Aspects of the Novel, applied the terms “flat” and
“round” to describe fictional characters. Those true to life he considered to
be “round,” while “flat” characters served only one purpose in the story.
Authors
create flat characters to represent a specific idea or quality. Flat characters
are “immediately recognizable and can usually be represented by a single
sentence,” or characteristic. A flat character wants one thing. For example,
Miss Havisham from Charles Dickens’s novel Great Expectations, is a flat
character who seeks only revenge for being abandoned on her wedding day.
Flat characters:
- lack depth or development.
- support the main character, or other characters. Many stories and novels in fact feature flat characters as main characters, Sherlock Holmes and Doctor Watson for example, as well as the characters in various stories such as the “Twilight” series.
- maintain the characteristics or familiar traits of a stereotype, e.g., Miss Havisham as the jilted bride.
- maintain one perspective or viewpoint.
- help create atmosphere, mood, or comedy.
- are vivid but simple.
- predictable in terms of their behavior.
- are easily recognizable by readers and remembered for these very characteristics.
When a flat character takes on multiple aspects and a realistic character defects, the flat persona curves towards the rounded character.
The term “round” refers to characters sufficiently complex “to be able to surprise the reader without losing credibility,” as William Harmon and Hugh Holman state in their classic work, A Handbook to Literature. As readers, we invest more emotion in round characters and may well feel disappointed when we no longer have them in our lives, once we finish reading their stories.
Round characters:
- appear human, with multiple aspects to their personalities.
- let us know what they are thinking.
- can surprise us.
- are convincing and rich in character with flaws and qualities.
- have potential to change and develop throughout the story.
- desire something.
- experience conflict and therefore character development.
- are either likable or despicable.
***************************************************************************
Follow and support our YouTube channel to get English Literature summaries and Communicative English Lesson explanations and Task Answers.
Click this link to Subscribe : 👉 Saipedia