Monday, March 31, 2025

Morphology and Word Formation notes, Unit 4 Language and Linguistics (205C4B), 2nd Year, 4th Semester, B.A English Literature

University of Madras

Syllabus with effect from 2023-2024

B.A English Literature

[2nd Year, 4th Semester]

Language and Linguistics (205C4B)

Unit 4: Morphology and Word Formation


Unit4: Morphology and Word Formation 

4.1 Morphemes – Free and bound Morphemes

4.2 Affixes -Prefix, Suffix and Infix

4.3 Allomorphs - Zero morphemes Empty Morphemes

4.4 Compound Words, Back formation Portmanteau words, Clipping of Words

4.5 Morphophonemics - Phonetic Realization of Plural, Past, Third Person Singular morphemes (pronunciation of – ed, -s &-es)

4.1 Morphemes – Free and bound Morphemes

  When a morpheme can be both a morpheme and a word, it is called a free morpheme. But morphemes which occur only as a proper sub-part of a word (and not as a word) are called bound morphemes (e.g. ‘-ment’ and ‘dis-’). Hence ‘-ly’ is a bound morpheme in words like ‘properly’, ‘suddenly’, and ‘correctly’. It cannot exist alone as it is not a proper word of English.

Classification of Morphemes:

Ronald W Langacker in his book ‘Language and its Structure’ has divided morphemes into two classes: Lexical and Grammatical. Lexical Morphemes: Lexical Morphemes are – Nouns, Verbs, Adjectives and Adverbs. They have more or less independent meaning. They change their forms frequently. Lexical morphemes are in large numbers in the language. They are open ended. So the new members are added to the lexicon quite often. E.g. flower, rose, pluck, beautiful, rare etc.

Lexical morphemes carry the main meaning (or significance) of the word it belongs to. The morpheme ‘ready’ in ‘readiness’ carries the meaning of the word, as does ‘bound’ in ‘unbound’, or ‘cran’ in ‘cranberry’. These morphemes, because they carry the lexical meaning, are lexical morphemes.

Grammatical morphemes: Grammatical morphemes are elements like prepositions, articles, conjunctions, forms indicating number, gender, tense or so on. They, by and large, do not change frequently. New members in their family in any language are added rather infrequently. Grammatical morphemes can become attached to lexical morphemes. The ‘ing’ in ‘singing’ carries no lexical meaning, but it does provide a grammatical context for the lexical morpheme. It tells us that the ‘sing’ is ‘ing’ (as in ‘on-going’). In the same way, the morpheme ‘-ly’ in ‘timely’ carries no meaning independently, but it does turn the noun ‘time’ into a word more frequently used as an adverb.

Types of Morpheme:

Free Morpheme:

        Free morphemes are those morphemes that occur alone as independent words. For example, dog, film, run, front etc. Free morphemes can be used freely as words having their own specific meaning. They always contain and sustain their meaning wherever they occur in a sentence.

Bound Morpheme:

        A morpheme that doesn’t have any independent meaning and can be formed with the help of free morphemes is called a bound morpheme. Bound morphemes are those morphemes that cannot occur as independent words. For example; -less, -ness, pre-, un-, en-, -ceive, -ment. In bound morphemes we can study Prefix, Suffix, and Infix. It is also called as Affixation. All affixes are examples of bound morphemes.   

        However, some morphemes like and, or, but etc. are grammatical morphemes yet they are independent words.

4.2 Affixes -Prefix, Suffix and Infix

Morphemes such as –s, -ed, -ing, un-, mis-, -hood, -ship etc. are called affixes. Here one or more sounds occur as a bound form that are attached either to the beginning or to the end of a base word. These forms like –s, or –ed, or un- are attached to a base word, which is called a stem word. In the word unlikely, the affixes are un- and –ly, and the stem is like. In the word knowing, the stem is known and the affix is –ing. The stem know cannot be split any further. Such a stem which cannot be split any further is called a root. To a stem, affixes can be attached and thereby producing a derivative word or an inflectional form. 

Prefixes and Suffixes

An affix is added to a root word or a stem and it is of two types. They are suffixes and prefixes. Affixes which are attached at the beginning of the stem are called prefixes. The following are some examples:

Un- unkind

Dis- dislike

Mis- misrepresent

In- inequal

Re- resurrect

De- degrade

Im- impassable

Non- nonsense

Anti- antisocial 

The affixes which are attached at the end of the stem are called suffixes:

-ing (meaning)

-dom (kingdom)

-ship (friendship)

-less (thankless)

-ness (kindness)

-ly (kingly)

-ion (prohibition) 

Inflectional and Derivational Affixes

Affixes may be derivational or inflectional. Inflectional affixes change the form of word. For example, move, moves, moved, and moving are different forms of the same word. Therefore –s, -ed, and –ing are inflectional affixes. It refers to the formation of a new form of the same word.

Derivational affix, on the other hand, is a process of word formation. It refers to the formation of a new word from another word. Thank and thankless are different words, therefore –less is a derivational affix. 

Some words in English do not take inflectional suffixes. Such words are referred to as function words. Articles, prepositions, conjunctions, interjections, auxiliary verbs etc. are function words. The function words do not change form or meaning. Therefore they are referred to as closed class.  

4.3 Allomorphs - Zero morphemes Empty Morphemes

Morphemes and Allomorphs

Morphemes are the smallest meaningful constituents of words; Words are composed of morphemes (one or more). sing-er-s, home-work, un-kind-ly, ipp-ed, de-nation-al-iz-ation nej-ne-ob-hospod.ar-ova-tel-nejs-ho, auto-servis-u Morph. The term morpheme is used both to refer to an abstract entity and its concrete realization(s) in speech or writing. When it is needed to maintain the signi ed and signi er distinction, the term morph is used to refer to the concrete entity, while the term morpheme is reserved for the abstract entity only.

Allomorphs are a set of forms that a morpheme may take. They are the variants of a morpheme. While morphemes are concerned with the structure and meaning of words, allomorphs are concerned with the sound of words without changing the meaning. The morphemes are generally represented within braces and allomorphs are given in slash lines. The regular plurals of English nouns are realized as /-s/, /-z/ and /-es/.

If the morpheme ends in /s/ /ʃ/ and /ʧ/, then the allomorph /iz/ is selected.

Examples:

Fish – fishes- /fiʃiz/

Match- matches - /mæʧiz/

Bus – buses - /bʌsiz/

If the morpheme ends in voiced consonant or a vowel, the allomorph is /z/.

Examples:

Dog – dogs - /dɒgz/

Fly – flies – /flaiz/

Bird – birds- /bə:dz/

Monkey– monkeys - /mʌŋkiz/

The past tense of a morpheme, in most cases, is formed by adding –d or –ed to the word. The ending sound becomes /t/, /d/ or /id/. The past tense –ed is realized as /t/ if it is preceded by a voiceless consonant other than /t/. Some verbs whose ending sound is /t/ or /d/ the past tense of its ending sound becomes /id/.

Examples:

Jump – jumped - /dʒʌmpt/

Hunt – hunted - /hʌntid/

Brand – branded - /brændid/

Learn – learned - /lə:nid/

Kick – kicked - /kikt/

Bag – bagged - /bægd/ 

        Allomorphs are different forms of the same morpheme, and zero morphemes are a type of allomorph that have no phonetic form, while empty morphemes lack both form and meaning.

Zero morphemes:

A Zero morpheme also known as a null morpheme that has no phonetic form, but still carries grammatical meaning. In the zero morphemes the null morpheme is added to the root, therefore it has a function but no form.  For example: the verb put has same form in both past and present. Similarly the word cut has same form in both past and present. In the word sheep, the plural form is also sheep. The word sheep gets attached to a null plural morpheme, which changes the meaning but doesn’t change the form.

Empty morphemes:

Empty morphemes are those morphemes that has a phonological structure but no semantic content. It's a morph that doesn't contribute to the overall meaning of a word.

For example: cran in the word cran-berry, berry has meaning of its own but cran doesn’t have any semantic content.

4.4 Compound Words, Back formation Portmanteau words, Clipping of Words

Word formation

The word formation refers to the ways in which new words are formed. It is an ongoing process and new words continue to evolve. The process of word formation does not have a uniformity in all languages. It may vary from language to language. The following are some of the important word formation process:

Compound Words:

It is a process in which a word is formed out of two or more words. This type of words are called compound words. Here different forms of word classes combine to form new ones. In the word blackboard, an adjective combines with a noun. In most cases, the compound word retains the meaning of the two combined word. A blackboard is a board that is black in color. However, there are some compound words whose meanings cannot be assumed from the two combined words. For example the compound word white-collar, and black money.

Examples: teapot, manmade, footprint, tea-party, and bookshelf.

Back-formation

As the word indicates, it is the formation of a new word by removing the affixes. It is a reverse process of derivation. In this process a word is formed from another word by removing its affixes. Thus back- formation may be viewed as a sub-type of clipping.

Examples:

The verb resurrect is formed from the noun resurrection.

Project (V) - projection (N)

Edit (V) - editor (N)

Insert (V) – insertion (n)

Portmanteau word

A portmanteau word, also known as a blend, is a word created by combining parts of two or more existing words, usually the beginning of one and the end of another, to form a new word with a combined meaning.

Examples:

        “Brunch” (breakfast + lunch)

“Smog” (smoke + fog)

“Mockumentary” (mock + documentary)

“Spork” (spoon + fork)

“Frenemy” (friend + enemy)

“Motel” (motor + hotel)

“Mall” (market + hall)

 Clipping Words:

It is a shortening technique in which a new word is formed. Here a word is shortened to one of its parts by retaining the meaning. If the beginning of the word is retained, it is back clipping. The examination becomes exam, mathematics is shortened as math, laboratory – lab, gymnastics – gym.

In fore clipping, the final part is retained. The word telephone is reduced to phone, omnibus becomes bus, university – varsity, are some examples. 

4.5 Morphophonemics - Phonetic Realization of Plural, Past, Third Person Singular morphemes (pronunciation of – ed, -s &-es)

Morphophonemics

      Morphophonemics, also known as morphophonology, examines the interaction between morphology (word structure) and phonology (sound structure). It focuses on how morphemes, which are the smallest units of meaning in language, are realized phonetically.  

      In morphophonemics, deals with the interaction between morphological and phonological processes and how they these factors affect each other. Morphophonemic change usually occurs at morpheme boundaries and it involves sounds that are associated with separate phonemes.

Plural Morpheme:

      The rule determines the phonetic form of the plural morpheme has traditionally been called a morphophonemic rule, because its application is determined by both the morphology and the phonology. When a morpheme has alternative phonetic forms, these forms are called allomorphs by some linguists. [z], [s], and [əz] would be allomorphs of the regular plural morpheme, and determined by rule. Examples:

Singular: cat /kæt/, dog /dɒɡ/, bus /bʌs/

Plural: cats /kæts/, dogs /dɒɡz/, buses /bʌsɪz/

Past Tense Morpheme:

      The past-tense rule in English, like the plural-formation rule, must include morphological information. Notice that after a vowel or diphthong the form of the past tense is always [d], even though no phonological rule would be violated if a [t] were added, as shown by the words tight, bout, rote. When the word is a verb, and when the final alveolar represents the past tense morpheme, however, it must be a voiced [d] and not a voiceless [t]. Examples: 

Present: walk /wɔːk/, sing /sɪŋ/

Past: walked /wɔːkt/, sang /sæŋ/

Third-Person Singular Morpheme:

      The third-person singular morpheme is a grammatical marker (a morpheme) that signals the present tense and subject-verb agreement for singular, third-person subjects.

Examples:

Present: I walk, he walks

Morphophonemic processes:

Morphophonemic processes can involve alternations in vowel and consonant sounds, reflecting the interaction between morphology and phonology.

These processes help explain why certain plural forms in English, like 'goose' to 'geese', exhibit irregular changes instead of following standard rules.

They often come into play in verb conjugation, where the ending of a verb may change depending on tense or subject agreement.

Understanding morphophonemic processes is essential for analyzing language patterns and predicting how words will change in different grammatical contexts.

Languages around the world exhibit unique morphophonemic processes that reflect their specific phonological and morphological rules.

***********************************************************************************************

For more summaries and videos subscribe @Saipedia YouTube Channel 

and follow www.englishlitmeet.blogspot.com  Blogger


Tuesday, February 11, 2025

A Fable for Tomorrow by Rachel Carson, The Silent Spring - Chapter One, Unit 2, Green Studies (AG46D) Elective Paper, B.A English Literature, 3rd Year 6th Semester, University of Madras

B.A English Literature

3rd Year 6th Semester

Elective Paper 

GREEN STUDIES (AG46D)

Unit 2: Bioregionalism( Community, Region, Home) and Ecofeminism

2.2. “A Fable for Tomorrow’ by Rachel Carson  

(from The Silent Spring - Chapter One)

Text :

There was once a town in the heart of America where all life seemed to live in harmony with its surroundings. The town lay in the midst of a checkerboard of prosperous farms, with fields of grain and hillsides of orchards where, in spring, white clouds of bloom drifted above the green fields. In autumn, oak and maple and birch set up a blaze of color that flamed and flickered across a backdrop of pines. Then foxes barked in the hills and deer silently crossed the fields, half hidden in the mists of the fall mornings.

Along the roads, laurel, viburnum and alder, great ferns and wildflowers delighted the traveler’s eye through much of the year. Even in winter the roadsides were places of beauty, where countless birds came to feed on the berries and on the seed heads of the dried weeds rising above the snow. The countryside was, in fact, famous for the abundance and variety of its bird life, and when the flood of migrants was pouring through in spring and fall people traveled from great distances to observe them. Others came to fish the streams, which flowed clear and cold out of the hills and contained shady pools where trout lay. So it had been from the days many years ago when the first settlers raised their houses, sank their wells, and built their barns. 

Then a strange blight crept over the area and everything began to change. Some evil spell had settled on the community: mysterious maladies swept the flocks of chickens; the cattle and sheep sickened and died. Everywhere was a shadow of death. The farmers spoke of much illness among their families. In the town the doctors had become more and more puzzled by new kinds of sickness appearing among their patients. There had been several sudden and unexplained deaths, not only among adults but even among children, who would be stricken suddenly while at play and die within a few hours. 

There was a strange stillness. The birds, for example—where had they gone? Many people spoke of them, puzzled and disturbed. The feeding stations in the backyards were deserted. The few birds seen anywhere were moribund; they trembled violently and could not fly. It was a spring without voices. On the mornings that had once throbbed with the dawn chorus of robins, catbirds, doves, jays, wrens, and scores of other bird voices there was now no sound; only silence lay over the fields and woods and marsh. 

On the farms the hens brooded, but no chicks hatched. The farmers complained that they were unable to raise any pigs—the litters were small and the young survived only a few days. The apple trees were coming into bloom but no bees droned among the blossoms, so there was no pollination and there would be no fruit.

The roadsides, once so attractive, were now lined with browned and withered vegetation as though swept by fire. These, too, were silent, deserted by all living things. Even the streams were now lifeless. Anglers no longer visited them, for all the fish had died.

In the gutters under the eaves and between the shingles of the roofs, a white granular powder still showed a few patches; some weeks before it had fallen like snow upon the roofs and the lawns, the fields and streams.

No witchcraft, no enemy action had silenced the rebirth of new life in this stricken world. The people had done it themselves. 

This town does not actually exist, but it might easily have a thousand counterparts in America or elsewhere in the world. I know of no community that has experienced all the misfortunes I describe. Yet every one of these disasters has actually happened somewhere, and many real communities have already suffered a substantial number of them. A grim specter has crept upon us almost unnoticed, and this imagined tragedy may easily become a stark reality we all shall know.

What has already silenced the voices of spring in countless towns in America? This book is an attempt to explain.

***********************************************************************************************

For more summaries and videos subscribe @Saipedia YouTube Channel 

and follow www.englishlitmeet.blogspot.com  Blogger